<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dsl reports &#8211; PPCGeeks.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ppcgeeks.com/tag/dsl-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ppcgeeks.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Radiation Labels For Cell Phones? Maine Says No, San Francisco Says Yes</title>
		<link>https://www.ppcgeeks.com/2010/03/30/radiation-from-cell-phones-maine-says-no-san-francisco-says-yes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dsl reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electromagnetic radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcgeeks.com/?p=4301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While the city of San Francisco endeavors onwards to make it a legal requirement for cell phone makers to include radiation labels on their handsets, various Maine lawmakers have been pushing a similar bill that would require labels on phones and packaging warning users (especially the pregnant women and helpless children) keep the devices away [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.ppcgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RadiationCell.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px; border: 0pt none;" src="https://www.ppcgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RadiationCell.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="10" width="400" height="200" align="left" /></a></p>
<p>While the city of San Francisco endeavors onwards to make it a legal requirement for cell phone makers to include radiation labels on their handsets, various Maine lawmakers have been pushing a similar bill that would require labels on phones and packaging warning users (especially the  pregnant women and<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh2sWSVRrmo" target="_blank"> helpless children</a>) keep the devices away from their head and  bodies because of the cancer risk from electromagnetic radiation (not<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/25470564@N08/4203209127/in/pool-chernobyl-2" target="_blank"> this</a> type of radiation, which is the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster" target="_blank">worst ever release of radiation</a> that has ever occurred).</p>
<p>However, this legislative work is now dead according to <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/zd/20100329/tc_zd/249617" target="_blank">PC Magazine</a>. What a waste of a good name of law, as the official name of the bill was enticing as it was to be known as the &#8220;Children&#8217;s Wireless Protection Act&#8221;. Also, remember folks, we may not have to worry about cell phone radiation as the world *may* end in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon" target="_blank">2012</a>.</p>
<p>Source- <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Maine-Rejects-Radiation-Warning-Labels-on-Cell-Phones-107631" target="_blank">DSL Report</a></p>
<p>Image Credit- <a href="http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2008/01/having_trouble_sleeping_it_mig.php" target="_blank">SF Weekly</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
