<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>3G network &#8211; PPCGeeks.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.ppcgeeks.com/tag/3g-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.ppcgeeks.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Sprint is not &#8220;America’s most dependable 3G network&#8221;?</title>
		<link>https://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/26/sprint-is-not-america%e2%80%99s-most-dependable-3g-network/</link>
					<comments>https://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/26/sprint-is-not-america%e2%80%99s-most-dependable-3g-network/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon Wirless]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcgeeks.com/?p=1608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[America’s most dependable 3G network. For a while now that has been what Sprint has used to describe their wireless network. However, Verizon Wireless has now called turkey (Ed.- It is Thanksgiving here in the U.S. so this cliche is allowable.) on this claim. The National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="https://www.ppcgeeks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Sprint3G.bmp" border="0" alt="" hspace="10" width="276" height="197" align="right" /></p>
<p>America’s most dependable 3G network. For a while now that has been what Sprint   has used to describe their wireless network. However, Verizon Wireless   has now called turkey <em>(Ed.- It is Thanksgiving here in the U.S. so   this cliche is allowable.)</em> on this claim.</p>
<p><span id="more-1608"></span></p>
<p>The National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better   Business Bureaus, which is a consumer advocacy group that focuses on   advertising, has recently asked that Sprint stop using the slogan after   Verizon complained that Sprint is indeed not the most dependable 3G   network. The NAD had this to say-</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Verizon Wireless had a  lower connection failure rate and  a lower task failure rate than Sprint  and performed better in terms of  session reliability. NAD determined  that Verizon&#8217;s superiority on those  measures &#8211; according to the most  recent Nielsen drive tests &#8211; undermined  Sprint&#8217;s &#8220;most dependable&#8221;  claim as to outdoor usage&#8230;Following its  review of the evidence, NAD  determined that the advertiser lacked  sufficient support for its claim  to be &#8220;America&#8217;s most dependable 3G  network.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Sprint, which uses both old and new Nielsen data to draw  their   conclusion, says they will appeal the ruling-</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The  NAD is mistaken in its determination that signal  strength is not  relevant to dependability,&#8221; Sprint said in an official  statement sent  to eWEEK. &#8220;Between 70-80% of 3G data use takes place  indoors, and the  Nielsen signal strength tests indicate whether a signal  is likely to  penetrate a building and provide coverage inside. If a 3G  signal is too  weak to penetrate a building, a subscriber will not be  able to  dependably connect to the network&#8230; The Nielsen test data  continues to  show Sprint leading in 3G signal strength. As a result of  this and  other factors, we stand by our ‘most dependable’ claim and we  are  confident that it is well-supported by timely and appropriate data.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>With Verizon claiming that it has the biggest network, and  AT&amp;T  chirping it has the fastest network,  Sprint found that it can  claim  that it has the most dependable network.</p>
<p>So readers, who does have the most dependable wireless network?</p>
<p>Source- <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Sprints-Wireless-Network-Apparently-Not-Most-Dependable-105649" target="_blank">DSLReports.com</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/26/sprint-is-not-america%e2%80%99s-most-dependable-3g-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
