Radiation Labels For Cell Phones? Maine Says No, San Francisco Says Yes
While the city of San Francisco endeavors onwards to make it a legal requirement for cell phone makers to include radiation labels on their handsets, various Maine lawmakers have been pushing a similar bill that would require labels on phones and packaging warning users (especially the pregnant women and helpless children) keep the devices away from their head and bodies because of the cancer risk from electromagnetic radiation (not this type of radiation, which is the worst ever release of radiation that has ever occurred).
However, this legislative work is now dead according to PC Magazine. What a waste of a good name of law, as the official name of the bill was enticing as it was to be known as the "Children's Wireless Protection Act". Also, remember folks, we may not have to worry about cell phone radiation as the world *may* end in 2012.
Source- DSL Report
Image Credit- SF Weekly
© 2010, BigDiesel07. All rights reserved.
lol, that about some this idea up.
This article was very misleading…
@Whosdaman –
Very
I updated the title of the article to better reflect the topic at hand
Whats the name of that phone?
@ALi –
No clue
what did the title originally say?
@TeamMike –
Original title was “Radiation From Cell Phones? Maine Says No, San Francisco Says Yes”
^ oh, thx.
@TeamMike –
No problem
Been using cells for 10 years+… So far, so good.
Really, that is a bad ass cell phone, what is it?
What a joke. It is California. Plenty of money and even more elected officals without a 6th grade education!