<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Accounts for 55% of US Mobile Web Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/23/iphone-accounts-for-55-of-us-mobile-web-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/23/iphone-accounts-for-55-of-us-mobile-web-traffic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:18:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AstronusX</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/23/iphone-accounts-for-55-of-us-mobile-web-traffic/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>AstronusX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcgeeks.com/?p=1550#comment-954</guid>
		<description>The report doesn&#039;t seem to be accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The report doesn&#8217;t seem to be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPCFreak</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/23/iphone-accounts-for-55-of-us-mobile-web-traffic/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>PPCFreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcgeeks.com/?p=1550#comment-949</guid>
		<description>This may be reporting false data.
Most WinMo users I work with have the user agent strings for there browsers set to none mobile parameters. This way they get the none-mobile version of sites that redirect based on user-agent string from the browser.
Find it real hard to believe that webOS is ahead of WinMo in the surfing relm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be reporting false data.<br />
Most WinMo users I work with have the user agent strings for there browsers set to none mobile parameters. This way they get the none-mobile version of sites that redirect based on user-agent string from the browser.<br />
Find it real hard to believe that webOS is ahead of WinMo in the surfing relm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dishe</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/23/iphone-accounts-for-55-of-us-mobile-web-traffic/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>dishe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcgeeks.com/?p=1550#comment-934</guid>
		<description>Problem is, we aren&#039;t told how these numbers are being generated. 
What sites are being monitored, and how are they determining what OS is requesting it?
The thing with iPhone, RIM, and Android is that their browsers are very easily identified. How many WM users actually USE pocket IE? Are they looking at the browser ID tag? With a plethora of WM browsers such as Opera, Netfront, and various server-side compression browsers such as SkyFire and Opera Mini, most of which identify themselves as Desktop-based browsers, how is AdMob identifying these?

I&#039;ve had this conversation with another statistics firm before, and the numbers are not necessarily accurate given all the information... 
I&#039;m still rather certain that iPhone is the dominating browser in the US, however I think Windows Mobile and &quot;other&quot; are not getting counted properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem is, we aren&#8217;t told how these numbers are being generated.<br />
What sites are being monitored, and how are they determining what OS is requesting it?<br />
The thing with iPhone, RIM, and Android is that their browsers are very easily identified. How many WM users actually USE pocket IE? Are they looking at the browser ID tag? With a plethora of WM browsers such as Opera, Netfront, and various server-side compression browsers such as SkyFire and Opera Mini, most of which identify themselves as Desktop-based browsers, how is AdMob identifying these?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had this conversation with another statistics firm before, and the numbers are not necessarily accurate given all the information&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;m still rather certain that iPhone is the dominating browser in the US, however I think Windows Mobile and &#8220;other&#8221; are not getting counted properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlin</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/23/iphone-accounts-for-55-of-us-mobile-web-traffic/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>mlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcgeeks.com/?p=1550#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Wow, that&#039;s impressive. No wonder AT&amp;T is having so many problems...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s impressive. No wonder AT&amp;T is having so many problems&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Accounts for 55% of US Mobile Web Traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.ppcgeeks.com/2009/11/23/iphone-accounts-for-55-of-us-mobile-web-traffic/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Accounts for 55% of US Mobile Web Traffic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ppcgeeks.com/?p=1550#comment-932</guid>
		<description>[...]              1 votes   vote     iPhone Accounts for 55% of US Mobile Web Traffic    AdMob, recently acquired by Google, has released its latest report breaking down the US Mobile [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]              1 votes   vote     iPhone Accounts for 55% of US Mobile Web Traffic    AdMob, recently acquired by Google, has released its latest report breaking down the US Mobile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

